By: Diane Kashin, Ed.D, RECE. In my last post I discussed the importance of dramatic play and why it should not be taken for granted. Art like dramatic play is an essential experience for children but it is one that is often hijacked by adults and turned into a product-oriented, adult-directed craft. When I visit programs and see pre-cut shapes, paper plates and theme-related products displayed on bulletin boards, I am saddened by the missed opportunities. Imagine if the children who re-produced these apples had the opportunity to sketch, draw, paint and sculpt their own interpretations of a basket of apples. Each child’s art would be uniquely their own.
In the early learning textbook that I co-wrote with Dr. Beverlie Dietze, Playing and Learning in Early Childhood Education we refer to the work of Erika Christakis who determined that art for children should be offered for art’s sake and that it is an essential ingredient to a well-rounded education. Art is an expression of one’s self. It is a curriculum area that should not be up for debate; rather, it is beneficial to view art as a learning domain, similar to critical thinking and number sense. Historically, art has been a major component of early learning programs. Dewey, Steiner, and Froebel all discussed the importance of art to the development of the whole child. The educators in Reggio Emilia, Italy, also place a high value on art experiences (Vecchi, 2010). Open-ended exploration of art materials and tools should be seen as a right of childhood. However, since the late twentieth century and during the first 15 years of the twenty-first century, the wide spectrum of art experiences for young children has continuously been reduced and replaced with activities that have a more academic focus (Christakis, 2016).
Art needs to be open-ended. Art needs to be part of a play-based curriculum and therefore should be freely chosen. Art experiences should not be a time for adults to direct children to produce “cute” crafts that have a defined right way of completion. Children gain a sense of success from open-ended materials because there is no one right way to do something and no need to specifically produce something. Having transient art experiences which is art that is movable and non-permanent available to children supports the process and de-emphasizes the product. By providing empty frames, mats, or other platforms and multiple loose parts without glue or paint, children create without consuming the materials, and the materials can be used another day.
Children’s art should be more than the production of something recognizable to the adult or a specific product—art needs to be a process. If the product is over-emphasized there is a likelihood that children’s creativity will be impacted. This is not a new phenomenon – this has been a recurring issue for children. In the poem, The Little Boy written many years ago by Helen Buckley we see that dictated art changes a creative child into a compliant child. This video depiction of the poem is so powerful and so sad.
Art experiences for children should not be dictated by adults. Colouring books, for example negatively affect a child’s opportunity for creativity. They do not support a child’s individual expression. The fact that they can choose their own colour is not enough! Choosing a colour and what spot to fill in involves such a minimal level of creativity as it is so confining. This type of experience is doing without thinking and it promotes mindless obedience to authority, rather than creative problem solving. The sense of achievement and pride that should come from art is lacking in dictated art (Christakis, 2016). Cornett and Smithrim (2001) indicated that “dictated art” could frustrate children’s development. When children are not involved in a creative problem-solving process, they are not stimulated or encouraged to engage in higher-order thinking. One of the key purposes of providing children with art experiences is for them to learn to express their feelings and ideas; it is not to have children duplicate adult ideas. If the experience has been chosen for the children and they need to follow particular directions in order to produce a particular product, most likely time will be spent reminding them about the instructions. In the end, the results may be disappointing. I have watched adults resort to trying to fix children’s products in order to duplicate. There are so many possibilities for children’s art. My colleague and friend, Cindy Green, when speaking of dictated art simply states, “it’s over”. We recently had a powerful experience in our workshop, Environment Basics and Beyond: The Art Area where we set up experiences for the participants that demonstrated the possibilities. Lights bulbs went off as the participants had the opportunity to experience first-hand the importance of open-ended art.
Spending time experiencing art and learning about the principles and elements of art will support the teachers in supporting children. When children engage in art experiences, they explore the principles of design. When they repeat marks on a paper and create a flow in their design, they are exhibiting the principle of rhythm and movement. When children play with balance in their art they are discovering symmetry and asymmetry. The results that come from the use of different and contrasting elements illustrate the principle of variety. Playing with emphasis will make something stand out, such as placing dark beside light or large next to small. Considering how all the aspects of a child’s creation work together is following the principle of unity.
Children need teachers who understand the elements of art. These elements should be considered in the provision of art experiences and in talking to children about their art. Children require a variety of art experiences in order to learn about the concepts of the elements of art. The elements of art correlate with cognitive and language development. Feeling successful about their art experiences contributes to social and emotional development. The use of tools in art supports physical development and self-expression.
It was so gratifying to see the teachers in our workshop messing about with art and recognizing that in order to best serve children, they need to be dedicated learners as well.
Spending time experiencing art should help the teachers recognize that children need lots of time to become fluent themselves with the stages and languages of artistic development. Having the time to freely explore boosts children’s confidence to express themselves without needing adult praise and reduces the “I can’t do it” way of thinking. Children require the freedom to engage in appropriate art process experiences that are fluid in nature. We are hoping that more early learning teachers will seek ongoing professional learning so that they continue to gain an understanding of the relationship of art to child development and of the design and delivery of appropriate art experiences for children. We hope to have many more opportunities to co-facilitate this workshop to support the importance of art in the development of young children and to advocate for art for art’s sake.
I was fortunate to come to teaching at a time when the importance of open-ended art was recognized in my B.Ed. program! I have witnessed a slow transition in this direction in the schools where I have taught for the last 8 years. The one comment that I want to make is regarding praise. Sometimes at the end of two years of watching a child embrace their own journey as an artist – it is hard not to praise the products they create. I have witnessed the most exciting growth of children as artists in my time as a teacher. There are two things that I repeat over and over to myself to help continue supporting their growth. 1. Praise their commitment, their effort, their dedication and perseverance. 2. When praising the completed product – be very specific about what you notice in terms of growth. e.g. “I like how you have taken the time to carefully draw the roots on your tree with so much detail. Do you see how much your drawing has changed from the trees you were drawing last year?” or “I can see how much thought you put into choosing and mixing your colours to match the colours of the lilacs in your painting.” Please note that I must be very self-conscious of providing meaningful feedback and not empty praise. I am from the generation of “empty praise”. In case others might be to, I thought I would share my thoughts on this.
Thanks Nadine! With art this is particularly important. There was an article written in 1988 called Praise vs. Encouragement that had a profound impact on me! I couldn’t find it but this one speaks to it as well … http://articles.extension.org/pages/25728/praise-effort-instead-of-product-when-discussing-childrens-art